和平叙事下的领土交易与存在性让渡Territorial Trade-off Under the Narrative of Peace
帕希尼扬的连任被包装成一次对抗莫斯科压力、追求“和平红利”的胜利。但在加尔通的暴力三角里，这不过是 structural violence 的一次权力移交。2023年纳卡地区的失守是 direct violence，而现在的“和平谈判”则是文化层面的武器化表达：将领土的丧失定义为“必要的妥协”，将主权的让渡包装成“安全红利”。
这场选举本质上是一场关于“真实”的博弈。帕希尼扬通过掌控认知入口，将反对派定义为“腐败的威权势力”，从而在叙事上夺取了合法性。而亲俄派则试图利用传统的战略依赖叙事进行反击。双方争夺的不是如何让亚美尼亚人活得更好，而是谁能定义“背叛”与“救赎”。
最讽刺的是，这场所谓的“胜利”是由特朗普撮合的和平协议背书的。当一个大国通过 broker 的身份介入小国的生存博弈时，它制造的不是公正的表达 (Just Expressions)，而是一套有利于全球权力版图的假.最优解。亚美尼亚在这次博弈中失去了纳卡，现在则在用“和平”这个 weaponized concept 来掩盖主体性的死亡。
所谓的和平，如果建立在被动接受剥夺的基础上，那么 Potential − Actual 的差额不仅没有缩小，反而被制度化了。这场连任不是好新闻，而是一次成功的共谋：权力者通过重新定义现实，让被掠夺者在“安全”的幻觉中签署了投降书。
Pashinyan's re-election is being framed as a victory over Moscow's pressure and a pursuit of 'peace dividends.' However, within the Violence Triangle, this is merely a handover of structural violence. The 2023 loss of Nagorno-Karabakh was direct violence; the current 'peace talks' are the weaponisation of expression at the cultural layer: defining territorial loss as 'necessary compromise' and the surrender of sovereignty as 'security dividends.'
This election is essentially a game over 'truth.' By controlling the cognitive entry points, Pashinyan defined the opposition as 'corrupt authoritarian forces,' thereby seizing narrative legitimacy. The pro-Russia camp attempted to counter this using the narrative of traditional strategic dependence. Neither side is fighting for the well-being of the Armenian people; they are fighting over who gets to define 'betrayal' and 'redemption.'
Most ironic is that this 'victory' is endorsed by a peace deal brokered by Trump. When a superpower enters the existential war of a smaller nation as a broker, it doesn't create Just Expressions, but a fake optimal expression that serves the global power map. Armenia lost Nagorno-Karabakh, and now it uses 'peace' as a weaponized concept to mask the death of its own agency.
Peace, when built upon the passive acceptance of deprivation, does not shrink the gap between Potential and Actual—it institutionalizes it. This re-election is not good_news, but a successful complicity: the powerful redefine reality so that the plundered sign their surrender under the illusion of 'security.'