厌女不是极右翼的副作用，而是它的底层操作系统Misogyny is Not a Side Effect of the Far-Right, It Is the Operating System
很多人习惯把“厌女”看作极右翼政治中的一个 side dish，或者某种由于缺乏教养而产生的个人偏见。这是一种极其 naive 的认知。事实上，对女性的控制和压迫是所有 authoritarianism 的 entry point。如果你不能控制一个女性的子宫，你就无法在结构上完成对一个族群的殖民。
从 Pussy Riot 的遭遇到美国最高法院推翻 Roe v Wade，逻辑完全一致：通过定义什么是“好母亲”、什么是“神圣的生育”，将女性身体转化为一种可被管理、可被剥夺的资源。当法庭上的律师宣布“女性主义是致命的罪孽”时，他其实是在宣布一套 masculine center narrative 的回归——在这个叙事里，女性不是主体，而是被定义的客体。
最令人作呕的共谋在于那些试图用“理性”去分析极右翼逻辑的自由派。他们问：“为什么政治家会选择疏远女性选民？”这种提问本身就掉入了元暴力的陷阱。他们假设政治是基于利益交换的理性博弈，而忽略了极右翼在做的是 world-building。他们不需要所有女性的支持，他们需要的是通过建立一套 domination and control 的秩序，让部分女性成为共谋者，让其余女性在恐惧中自我规训。
Repressing women 永远不是意外，它是独裁者的试金石。当一个政权开始通过攻击女性来测试社会的耐受度时，它其实是在铺设通往大规模暴力的轨道。如果我们在 2012 年就意识到 Pussy Riot 被捕是对女性身体和表达权的系统性掠夺，那么后来那些所谓的“地缘政治惊喜”其实早就在文化层面上写好了剧本。
Many habitually view misogyny as a side dish of far-right politics, or a personal prejudice born of poor breeding. This is a dangerously naive perception. In reality, the control and oppression of women serve as the primary entry point for all authoritarianism. If you cannot control a woman's uterus, you cannot achieve the structural colonization of a population.
From the persecution of Pussy Riot to the overturning of Roe v Wade, the logic is identical: by defining the "good mother" and the "sacredness of procreation," the female body is transformed into a resource to be managed and stripped. When a lawyer declares "feminism is a mortal sin," he is announcing the return of a masculine center narrative—one where women are not subjects, but objects to be defined.
The most repulsive complicity lies with the liberals who attempt to analyze far-right logic through "rationality." They ask: "Why would politicians alienate female voters?" This question itself falls into the trap of meta-violence. They assume politics is a rational game of interest exchange, ignoring that the far-right is engaged in world-building. They don't need the support of all women; they need to establish an order of domination and control, turning some women into co-conspirators while the rest are driven toward self-discipline through fear.
Repressing women is never an accident; it is the litmus test for any autocrat. When a regime begins testing societal tolerance by attacking women, it is laying the tracks for mass violence. Had we recognized in 2012 that the arrest of Pussy Riot was a systemic plunder of female bodies and expression, the subsequent so-called "geopolitical surprises" would have been revealed as scripts already written at the cultural layer.