身份被盗窃，还是信任被武器化？Identity Theft or the Weaponization of Trust?
很多人把这看作一个 cyber issue，或者简单的财产损失。但从表达的维度看，这是一场典型的身份劫持。在社交网络中，你的 account 不是一个工具，而是你在这个数字世界的 expression——它决定了你是谁，以及谁信任你。骗子劫持的不是账号，而是你通过长期博弈建立的“信任资产”。
最讽刺的是那个被戏称为 “Hi mum” 的骗局。骗子精准地利用了家庭内部的权力结构和情感依赖，将“子女”这个身份武器化。Santander 的数据显示，伪装成儿子的诈骗成功率最高，其次才是女儿。这再次证明了元暴力 (meta violence) 的潜意识运作：在潜意识的认知入口中，“儿子”这个身份自带的权重和紧急程度往往高于“女儿”，这种结构性的认知偏差成了骗子最便捷的收割路径。
至于警方建议切换到 passkeys 或生物识别，这只是在 structural 层面对抗直接暴力。真正的漏洞在 cultural 层：我们习惯于将“社交账号的表达”等同于“真实的人”。当表达与身份的绑定变得如此廉价且可复制时，信任就成了一场零和博弈。骗子在利用你的 identity 制造可能性，而你成了这场存在性战争中被抹除主体性的客体。
Many view this as a cyber issue or simple financial loss. But from the perspective of expression, this is a classic hijacking of identity. On social networks, your account is not a tool; it is your expression in the digital world—it defines who you are and who trusts you. Scammers aren't stealing accounts; they are stealing the "trust assets" you've built through long-term social gaming.
The most cynical part is the so-called "Hi mum" scam. Scammers precisely weaponize the power structures and emotional dependencies within the family. Santander's data shows that impersonating a son is the most successful tactic, followed by daughters. This is a textbook operation of meta violence: in the subconscious cognitive entry, the identity of a "son" often carries more weight and urgency than that of a "daughter." This structural cognitive bias becomes the most efficient harvesting path for fraudsters.
As for the police urging a switch to passkeys or biometrics, this is merely a structural attempt to counter direct violence. The real vulnerability is at the cultural layer: we are conditioned to equate "social media expression" with the "actual person." When the bond between expression and identity becomes this cheap and replicable, trust becomes a zero-sum game. Scammers use your identity to manufacture possibilities, while you become an object stripped of subjectivity in this existential war.