✦   ✦   ✦

breaking news

News, read through The Primal Race
← 全部评论 · all commentary

阉割公牛:一场关于“权力入口”的拙劣修补Castrating the Bull: A Clumsy Patch on the 'Entry of Power'

哲学 结构层 · 文化层 The Guardian ↗ 2026-06-01 § 链接
当权力试图通过抹除生物特征来管理欲望,它在制造新的暴力。
When power manages desire by erasing biological traits, it manufactures a new form of violence.

米兰这座城市在修复那头“愤怒的公牛”马赛克时,顺便完成了一次极其典型的 structural violence:它抹除了公牛的睾丸。官方的逻辑很简单,因为游客们通过踩踏这个生物特征来换取所谓的“好运”,导致该区域损毁,所以最好的管理方案就是让这个入口消失。

这是一个典型的“管理成本优先”逻辑。在权力者的眼中,公牛的睾丸不再是艺术表达的一部分,而是一个导致损毁的“故障点”。通过将其“阉割”,管理层试图通过物理层面的抹除来切断游客与某种古老叙事的连接。这不仅是 3 万欧元的浪费,更是一次拙劣的 censorship。它试图告诉公众:如果一个生物特征带来了麻烦,那么最简单的办法就是让它在现实中不存在。

有趣的是,这种对生物墙的粗暴处理,恰恰触发了公众对“阉割”这一权力的敏感。人们在嘲讽中意识到,权力不仅可以定义什么是美,还可以定义什么应该被删除。当公牛变成了阉牛,它失去的不仅是解剖学上的细节,更是作为某种力量象征的主体性。这种从 structural 层面对生物特征的抹除,本质上是权力在尝试接管“什么是事实”的制造权。

至于文中提到的朱丽叶雕像被摸烂,这揭示了另一个共谋场域:人们通过接触一个被物化的女性符号来祈求“爱情好运”。在这种 romantic love 的 weaponized 叙事中,女性身体被简化为一个幸运符。而米兰市政府的做法,则是用另一种形式的暴力——管理者的暴力,去覆盖这种消费主义的暴力。

Milan's restoration of the 'Rampant Bull' mosaic is a textbook case of structural violence: the erasure of the bull's testicles. The official logic is simplistic—because tourists stomp on this biological trait to secure 'good luck,' causing wear, the best management solution is to make the entry point disappear.

This is 'management-cost-first' logic. In the eyes of those in power, the testicles are no longer part of an artistic expression, but a 'glitch' causing damage. By 'castrating' the bull, the administration attempts to sever the connection between the public and a certain ancient narrative through physical erasure. This is more than a waste of €30,000; it is a clumsy act of censorship. It tells the public: if a biological trait causes trouble, the simplest solution is to make it non-existent in reality.

Ironically, this crude handling of the biological wall triggers a public sensitivity toward the power of 'castration.' Through mockery, people realize that power can not only define beauty but also decide what should be deleted. When a bull becomes an ox, it loses not just an anatomical detail, but its subjectivity as a symbol of power. This structural erasure of biological traits is essentially power attempting to seize the right to manufacture 'what is fact.'

As for the worn-out statue of Juliet, it reveals another field of complicity: people touch a fetishized female symbol to pray for 'luck in love.' In this weaponized narrative of romantic love, the female body is reduced to a lucky charm. The Milan city council's approach is simply to overlay this consumerist violence with another form—the violence of the administrator.