所谓的“可预防性”是制度暴力最卑劣的PRThe 'Preventability' Scam: A PR Shield for Structural Violence
当调查报告开始讨论血液制品是否能更快速地输送以提高一个19岁少年的“生存概率”时，这场审判已经从对暴力的追责变成了对医疗技术的细节审计。这是典型的用 direct 层面的技术讨论，去掩盖 structural 层面的系统性溃败。所谓的“potentially preventable”（潜在可预防），在法律词典里可能是个概率问题，但在暴力三角的逻辑里，这是一个巨大的 scam。
真正的暴力不在于救护车快了五分钟还是慢了五分钟，而在于一个拥有爆炸物笔记、自称上帝、且在过去两年被强制入院四次、甚至在案发时持有逮捕令的暴力潜伏者，竟然能毫无阻碍地在公共空间行走并实施屠杀。警察漏掉了笔记本，忽略了对爆炸物的搜索，无视了之前的暴力袭击记录——这不是“疏忽”，这是元暴力下的一种共谋：将精神疾病患者客体化为“无害的疯子”或“不可控的随机变量”，从而在管理成本上采取最低限度的怠慢。
这种叙事陷阱极其阴险：它引导公众去关注救护车的速度，而不是关注那个让杀人犯在街头自由漫步的制度漏洞。当 Actual（实际状态）远低于 Potential（本应达到的安全状态）时，这中间的差额就是由警察、医疗监管和司法系统共同制造的结构性暴力。把死者的生命概率量化为“低于50%”，是对受害者主体性的最后一次剥夺。
这场调查最终会出一个报告，可能会批评某些流程不够 rapid，然后通过一次制度性的“表演让步”来平息愤怒。但只要解释权依然掌握在那些制造漏洞的共谋者手中，只要他们依然能用“精神疾病”和“医疗概率”来定义事实，下一个 Barnaby Webber 依然在排队。
When an inquiry shifts its focus to whether blood products could have been administered more rapidly to increase a 19-year-old's 'survivability,' the trial ceases to be about accountability and becomes a technical audit. This is a classic maneuver: using direct-level technical discussions to camouflage structural-level systemic collapse. The term 'potentially preventable' may be a probability in a legal dictionary, but in the logic of the Violence Triangle, it is a scam.
The real violence isn't about whether an ambulance arrived five minutes late; it is about how a violent latent agent—who kept notebooks on explosives, claimed to be God, had been sectioned four times in two years, and was under an active arrest warrant—could roam public spaces with total impunity. The police 'missed' notebooks and 'ignored' historical assaults. This isn't mere oversight; it is a form of complicity under meta-violence: objectifying the mentally ill as either 'harmless lunatics' or 'uncontrollable variables' to justify the lowest possible cost of management.
This narrative trap is insidious. It directs public attention toward the speed of emergency response rather than the systemic void that allowed a killer to walk the streets. When the Actual state is so far below the Potential safety state, the gap is a structural violence manufactured by the police, healthcare regulators, and the judicial system. Quantifying a victim's life as having a 'less than 50%' chance of survival is the final erasure of their subjectivity.
The inquiry will eventually publish a report, likely criticizing certain processes for not being 'rapid' enough, offering a performative concession to appease the public. But as long as the power of interpretation remains with the co-conspirators who created the loopholes—as long as they can define facts through 'mental illness' and 'medical probability'—the next Barnaby Webber is already in the queue.