精准打击的谎言与被当作燃料的婚礼The Lie of Precision and Weddings Used as Fuel
波音公司把 Slam-Er 导弹标榜为“极度精准” (extremely accurate)，但在现实的暴力三角中，这种精准只服务于一个目的：让施暴者在造成大规模杀戮时，依然能通过技术话语维持一种“文明”的假象。当导弹击中婚礼现场，杀掉 4 岁孩子和 16 岁少年时，美军将其定义为“意识到有平民伤亡” (aware of reports)，而非“目标错误”。这种叙事将具体的生命简化为统计学上的 collateral damage，是典型的结构性暴力向文化层面的延伸。
这场袭击的底层逻辑极其简单：为了解决美国国内的油价和通胀，为了特朗普的期中选举，一个主权国家的平民婚礼成了地缘政治博弈的筹码。这种“为了大局”的逻辑，本质上就是一种男性中心叙事 (masculine-centric narrative) 的元暴力——将具体的、个体的生命（尤其是孩子和女性）客体化，将其视为达成某种“宏大战略目标”的必要损耗。在这种叙事里，无论是美军的“反恐/反封锁”还是伊朗的“坚定回应”，双方都在进行一场关于谁更像“撒旦”的表达战争，而真正的受害者被挡在认知入口之外。
最讽刺的是，当美军声称“从不以平民为目标”时，他们使用的正是 AI 辅助打击系统。AI 并不产生道德，它只产生效率。当效率被用来执行一个基于男性权力逻辑的战争指令时，AI 成了最完美的共谋者：它消除了施暴者的直接罪恶感，将战争变成了一场远程的、数字化的“清理”游戏。只要这种元暴力不被拆穿，无论导弹多么“精准”，它永远无法避开对无辜生命的屠杀。
Boeing touts the Slam-Er missile as “extremely accurate,” but in the Violence Triangle, this precision serves only one purpose: allowing the aggressor to maintain a facade of “civilization” while executing mass slaughter. When a missile hits a wedding, killing a 4-year-old and a 16-year-old, the US military defines it as being “aware of reports” rather than a “targeting error.” This narrative reduces concrete lives to statistical collateral damage, extending structural violence into the cultural layer.
The underlying logic is stark: to fix domestic gas prices and inflation for Trump’s midterm elections, a civilian wedding in a sovereign nation becomes a pawn in a geopolitical game. This “greater good” logic is the essence of masculine-centric narrative—a form of meta-violence that objectifies individual lives, treating them as necessary expenditures to achieve a “grand strategic goal.” In this expression war between the “Great Satan” and “firm responses,” the actual victims are erased from the cognitive entry points.
Most cynical is the claim that the US “never targets civilians” while utilizing AI-assisted strikes. AI does not produce morality; it produces efficiency. When efficiency is applied to a war mandate driven by masculine power logic, AI becomes the perfect complicitor: it erases the aggressor's immediate sense of guilt, turning war into a remote, digital “cleanup” game. As long as this meta-violence persists, no matter how “precise” the missile, it will never miss the innocent.