奥斯陆协议的葬礼与“殖民蓝图”的升级The Funeral of the Oslo Accords and the Upgrade of the Colonial Blueprint
所谓的“大定居革命” (Great Settlement Revolution) 根本不是什么自发的民意，而是一场精准的 structural violence 升级。当暴力从 C 区转移到 A 区和 B 区，这在加尔通的暴力三角里意味着：直接层 (direct) 的袭击已经变成了文化层 (cultural) 叙事的武器化——将原本属于巴勒斯坦人的核心生存空间定义为“待开发的边疆”。
这种策略极其阴险：先在 C 区通过高压将巴勒斯坦人驱赶进 A、B 区，制造一种“这里更安全”的假象，然后迅速将暴力触角伸入这些核心区。这本质上是在执行一套成熟的殖民蓝图：通过 systematic, organised criminality 将原住民推向极小空间的孤岛，从而实现“尽可能多地吞并土地，尽可能少地保留人口”。
最令人作呕的是这种共谋 (complicity) 机制。定居者提供暴力输出，政府提供法律掩护，军队提供安全屏障。当 Ben-Gvir 等部长公开叫嚣废除奥斯陆协议时，他们其实是在宣布：那个曾经被包装成“和平”的 structural 框架已经完成了它的使命——它给以色列争取了时间，直到现在可以毫无顾忌地将其撕毁。
国际社会的所谓“谴责”或针对个别人物的制裁，在面对这种国家机器级别的元暴力 (meta violence) 时，不过是表演性的 PR。当一个政权将“种族清洗”直接写进战略地图时，任何不触及结构性权力转移的制裁都是在给施暴者提供一种“我已经交了罚款，可以继续抢劫”的心理安慰。
The so-called "Great Settlement Revolution" is not a spontaneous surge of public will, but a precise upgrade of structural violence. As violence shifts from Area C to Areas A and B, in the context of the Violence Triangle, direct attacks have evolved into the weaponisation of cultural narratives—redefining the core survival space of Palestinians as a "frontier to be conquered."
This strategy is insidious: first, Palestinians are forcibly pushed into Areas A and B through high pressure in Area C, creating a facade of relative safety, and then violence is rapidly extended into these heartlands. This is the execution of a classic colonial blueprint: using systematic, organised criminality to herd the indigenous population into tiny islands of existence, thereby achieving the goal of annexing maximum territory with minimum people.
Most revolting is the mechanism of complicity. Settlers provide the violent output, the government provides legal cover, and the military provides the security shield. When ministers like Ben-Gvir openly call for the cancellation of the Oslo Accords, they are announcing that the structural framework once packaged as "peace" has served its purpose—it bought Israel time until it could be torn apart without hesitation.
International "condemnation" or sanctions against individuals are merely performative PR when facing meta violence operated by a state machine. When a regime embeds "ethnic cleansing" directly into its strategic maps, any sanction that does not address the structural transfer of power is simply telling the aggressor: "You've paid the fine, you may continue the robbery."