AI的食尸鬼行为：用金钱购买解释权的终局AI’s Ghoulism: The Final Acquisition of Interpretive Power
这是一场极其典型的、由资本驱动的认知入口掠夺战。AI公司不再满足于在互联网这个巨大的垃圾场里翻找碎片，它们开始进入物理世界，像食尸鬼一样精准地搜寻那些尚未被数字化、未被 chatbot 污染的“纯净”文本。这种 bulk orders 的本质是：用金钱强行将物理世界的文化资产转化为数字世界的训练权重。
最讽刺的是这套操作的逻辑：买入 $\rightarrow$ 扫描 $\rightarrow$ 毁掉 (pulped)。这不仅是 structural violence，更是对文化传承的直接抹除。书籍在物理形态上的消失，意味着原本分散在二手书店、私人书架上的多样性叙事，被统一收编进一个黑盒模型中。从此，关于 18 世纪非洲农具或 19 世纪传记的解释权，不再属于翻开书页的读者，而属于那个决定输出概率的算法。
很多书商在抱怨这种行为“奇怪”或“破坏贸易”，但他们忽略了自己在这个博弈中的位置——他们是共谋者。当书商因为对方支付 "top whack" 而心满意足地出货时，他们实际上是在出卖人类文明的最后一块 sandbox。这种共谋的回报是短期的金钱，而代价是让 AI 彻底垄断对“什么是事实”的定义权。
当所有未数字化的文本都被扫描并销毁，人类将失去对照组。未来的后代如果想验证 AI 告诉他们的历史是否正确，会发现原本可以验证的物理书籍早已变成了 AI 训练集里的一个 token。这才是最深层的 meta violence：它不仅在书写历史，它在物理上消灭所有能反驳它的证据。
This is a textbook case of a war for cognitive portals driven by capital. AI firms are no longer content scavenging the digital landfill of the internet; they have entered the physical world, acting like ghouls to hunt for "unpolluted" texts—those not yet digitized or tainted by chatbot output. The essence of these bulk orders is simple: using money to forcibly convert the cultural assets of the physical world into weights within a digital model.
The logic is profoundly cynical: Buy $\rightarrow$ Scan $\rightarrow$ Pulp. This is not just structural violence; it is the direct erasure of cultural heritage. As books vanish in their physical form, the diverse narratives once scattered across secondhand shops and private shelves are subsumed into a single black-box model. From now on, the interpretive power over 18th-century African agricultural tools or 19th-century biographies no longer belongs to the reader turning a page, but to an algorithm calculating output probabilities.
Many booksellers complain that this behavior is "strange" or "disruptive," yet they ignore their own position in this game—they are complicit. By happily shipping books because the buyers pay "top whack," they are selling off the final sandbox of human civilization. The reward for this complicity is short-term profit; the cost is granting AI a total monopoly over the definition of "what is fact."
Once all non-digitized texts are scanned and destroyed, humanity loses its control group. Future generations, attempting to verify if the history told by an AI is accurate, will find that the physical evidence has been reduced to a token in a training set. This is the ultimate meta-violence: it doesn't just rewrite history; it physically annihilates every piece of evidence that could contradict it.