用“大规模袭击”掩盖的石油定价权博弈Oil Pricing Power Masked by 'Massive Attack' Narratives
特朗普口中的“massive attack”从来不是为了什么正义或安全，而是一次典型的表达武器化操作。当布伦特原油价格突破 100 美元大关，这种“大规模袭击”的威胁就成了操纵全球认知入口的杠杆。通过制造一个随时可能爆炸的战争预期，他试图在混乱中重新定义中东的权力版图，将石油定价权与军事恐吓强行绑定。
这场博弈的本质是典型的男性中心叙事（masculine-centric narrative）。从特朗普到鲁比奥，他们使用一套“以眼还眼”的丛林法则，将国家机器简化为一种粗暴的男性自尊博弈：谁更强，谁就拥有解释权。在这种元暴力的逻辑下，中东地区的平民——尤其是那些在战争阴影下被彻底客体化的女性——仅仅是这个博弈场中的背景板，是随时可以被牺牲的“代价”。
更讽刺的是，这种叙事在内部也是一种 scam。特朗普一边威胁伊朗，一边试图通过 Abraham Accords 强迫沙特在没有获得巴勒斯坦权利实质进展的情况下与以色列正常化。这不过是又一次利用“安全”作为筹码的强制交易。这种将主权、人权与资源分配通过军事威胁进行打包交易的行为，正是结构性暴力在国际政治中的最高级表达。
所谓的“不可想象的边缘”，其实就是权力者在进行一次关于“谁能定义现实”的压力测试。当他们把战争作为一种表达工具时，真正的暴力——那些在直接层面上发生的死亡与摧毁——就被掩盖在“战略考量”的文化伪装之下。
Trump's talk of a "massive attack" is never about justice or security; it is a classic weaponisation of expression. As Brent crude surges past $100, these threats of "massive attacks" serve as levers to manipulate the cognitive entry points of the global market. By manufacturing a state of imminent war, he attempts to redefine the power map of the Middle East, forcibly binding oil pricing power to military intimidation.
This game is a textbook manifestation of masculine-centric narrative. From Trump to Rubio, they employ a jungle law of "an eye for an eye," reducing the state machinery to a crude game of masculine ego: the strongest earns the right to interpret reality. Under this meta-violence, the civilians of the Middle East—especially women, who are completely objectified in the shadow of war—are merely backdrops to this arena, disposable "costs" of the game.
Even more cynical is how this narrative functions as a scam internally. Trump threatens Iran while simultaneously attempting to coerce Saudi Arabia into normalizing relations with Israel via the Abraham Accords, without any demonstrable progress on Palestinian rights. This is another forced transaction using "security" as a chip. This behavior—packaging sovereignty, human rights, and resource distribution into a transaction backed by military threats—is the most advanced expression of structural violence in international politics.
The so-called "edge of the unimaginable" is actually a stress test by the powerful to see who can define reality. When war is used as a tool of expression, the actual violence—the deaths and destruction at the direct layer—is hidden beneath the cultural disguise of "strategic considerations."