✦   ✦   ✦

breaking news

News, read through The Primal Race
← 全部评论 · all commentary

用“爱国者”的血量给战争定价Pricing War with the Blood of 'Patriots'

国际 直接层 · 结构层 · 文化层 · 元暴力 The Guardian ↗ 2026-07-20 § 链接
战争叙事是最高级的武器化表达:将人的身体降格为交换宏大意义的筹码。
War narratives are the ultimate weaponized expression: degrading human bodies into chips for exchanging grand meanings.

典型的男性中心叙事(masculine-centric narrative)现场。美国和伊朗两套权力机器在进行一场极其粗暴的“存在性战争”,而他们用来博弈的筹码,是具体的、有血有肉的士兵身体。

注意看特朗普的表达:他把死亡描述为“为了纪念三位伟大的爱国者”而发动袭击。这是一种极其阴险的武器化叙事——通过将死亡“神圣化”,掩盖了死亡本身的暴力属性,并将其转化为发动下一轮直接暴力(direct violence)的合法性入口。在这一套逻辑里,士兵不再是拥有主体性的个体,而是被降格为一种“货币”,用来购买所谓的“国家荣誉”或“战略威慑”。

这种元暴力(meta violence)在两端是对称的。伊朗方面在谈论“殉道士兵的血”,美国方面在谈论“伟大的爱国者”。双方都在利用认知入口,通过制造一种“英雄主义”的文化暴力,让人们忽视一个事实:无论是在伊拉克的受控爆破中丧生,还是在约旦的导弹袭击中死亡,这些身体都被当作了实现男性权力意志的工具。所谓的“惩罚”和“报复”,不过是两个男性主导的暴力机器在通过消耗下属的生命来维持自己的解释权。

最讽刺的是,这种博弈被包装成“为了防止核武器”或“保障航行安全”的文明叙事。事实上,这就是一场关于谁能定义“真实”的战争。当人们在讨论“第九个夜晚”的打击精度时,那些被抹除的个体存在感,正是这套元暴力机器运行的燃料。

A textbook display of masculine-centric narrative. The power machineries of the US and Iran are engaged in a brutal existential war, and the chips they use for gambling are the physical bodies of soldiers.

Observe Trump's expression: he frames the strikes as being carried out "in honour of three great patriots." This is a sinister form of weaponized expression—by "sacralizing" death, it masks the inherent violence of the act and transforms it into a legitimate entry point for further direct violence. In this logic, the soldier is no longer a subject with agency, but is degraded into a "currency" used to purchase so-called "national honor" or "strategic deterrence."

This meta-violence is symmetrical on both sides. Iran speaks of the "blood of martyred soldiers," while the US speaks of "great patriots." Both are utilizing cognitive entry points, creating a cultural violence of "heroism" to make people ignore the fact that these bodies are merely tools for the fulfillment of masculine power wills. The so-called "punishment" and "revenge" are nothing more than two male-dominated violent machineries consuming the lives of their subordinates to maintain their monopoly on interpretation.

The irony lies in how this game is wrapped in the civilized narratives of "preventing nuclear weapons" or "ensuring maritime security." In reality, this is a war over who defines "truth." While the public discusses the precision of the "ninth night" of strikes, the erased individuality of the victims is precisely the fuel that keeps this meta-violence machine running.