全球协作是AI时代的最高级共谋Global Cooperation: The Ultimate Complicity of the AI Era
英格兰银行行长 Andrew Bailey 呼吁的“国际协作”听起来像是在维护世界安全，但本质上是一次典型的 Structural Violence 升级。当 Trump 政府试图通过禁令垄断 Claude Mythos 这种 Frontier AI 时，他是在进行一场粗糙的、基于国界的认知入口争夺战。而 Bailey 提出的“协调测试”和“全球协作”，实际上是想把这种垄断从“单边霸权”升级为“俱乐部共谋”。
这种叙事最阴险的地方在于，它把 AI 的“威胁”定义为“坏人掌握了工具”，而心照不宣地抹杀了真正的 Meta Violence：即谁有权定义什么是“安全”，谁有权决定哪些模型可以“流通”。所谓的 Global Watchdog 并不是为了保护人类，而是为了确保 AI 的解释权和定价权依然掌握在像 Google DeepMind 这样的权力中心手中。这不过是把 AI 变成了另一种形式的核武器协议——只有被认可的“文明国家”才能持有，而其余的人被定义为需要被监管的“风险”。
至于 Rachel Reeves 提到的那些 GDP 和投资数据，不过是典型的用“指标”掩盖“处境”的 PR 游戏。在一个高度互联且被 Meta Violence 统治的系统中，所谓的“稳定性”往往意味着结构性剥削的效率得到了提升。当 AI 的认知入口被少数共谋者封锁，大多数人的存在性战争将失去最后的武器，只能在被定义好的“安全”框架里扮演被喂养的客体。
The "international cooperation" called for by Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey sounds like a plea for world safety, but it is essentially an upgrade of Structural Violence. When the Trump administration attempted to monopolize frontier AI like Claude Mythos through bans, it was conducting a crude battle for cognitive entry points based on national borders. Bailey's proposal for "coordinated testing" and "global cooperation" is an attempt to evolve this monopoly from "unilateral hegemony" into a "club-based complicity."
The most insidious part of this narrative is that it defines AI "threats" as "bad actors getting hold of tools," while silently ignoring the Meta Violence: who has the power to define "safety" and who decides which models are allowed to "circulate." The proposed Global Watchdog is not designed to protect humanity, but to ensure that the interpretation and pricing power of AI remain within power centers like Google DeepMind. This is simply turning AI into another nuclear non-proliferation treaty—where only "civilized nations" are permitted to hold the power, while everyone else is categorized as a "risk" to be managed.
As for the GDP and investment statistics cited by Rachel Reeves, they are typical PR games using metrics to mask situations. In a highly interconnected system ruled by Meta Violence, "stability" often means the efficiency of structural exploitation has improved. When the cognitive entry points of AI are locked by a few co-conspirators, the existential war for the masses will lose its final weapon, leaving them to play the role of consumed objects within a pre-defined framework of "safety."