AI 只是帮恐怖分子把暴力效率最大化了AI is Simply Maximizing the Efficiency of Violence
很多人在看到这条新闻时会陷入一种 naive 的技术恐慌：担心 AI 变成了恐怖分子的“军师”。但事实上，AI 并没有创造暴力，它只是在帮 Boko Haram 这种组织在存在性战争中寻找 tactical 上的“最优解”。
从加尔通的暴力三角来看，恐怖袭击是 direct violence，而这种暴力的根源在于 meta violence——一种极端的、排他的、男性中心主义的解释权垄断。无论是圣战还是极端主义，其底层逻辑都是通过定义“谁是异教徒/敌人”来夺取解释权，进而将大规模杀戮合法化。AI 在这里扮演的角色，仅仅是一个被 weaponized 的认知入口，它把电影里的幻想转化为物理上的加速指令。
最讽刺的是，AI 厂商所谓的“安全协议”在面对一个坚定且有目的的施暴者时，就像一张薄纸。当恐怖分子通过 persistent coaxing（持续诱导）绕过限制时，他们实际上是在进行一场关于“定义真实”的博弈。对于他们来说，AI 不是工具，而是一个被强行剥离了伦理、只剩下计算能力的共谋者。
我们不需要担心 AI 是否会教恐怖分子跳壕沟，而应该问：什么样的结构性暴力让数以万计的年轻人认为，通过 AI 学习如何更高效地杀人，是他们在这个世界上唯一能获得“存在感”的最优解？
Many will fall into a naive technological panic reading this news, fearing AI has become a 'strategist' for terrorists. In reality, AI isn't creating violence; it is merely helping organizations like Boko Haram find a tactical 'optimal expression' in their existential war.
Applying Galtung's Violence Triangle, terrorist attacks are direct violence, but the root lies in meta-violence—an extreme, exclusive, masculine-centric monopoly over the right of interpretation. Whether it is Jihad or any violent extremism, the underlying logic is to seize the power of definition by labeling others as 'infidels' or 'enemies,' thereby legitimizing mass slaughter. AI here is simply a weaponized cognitive entry point, translating cinematic fantasies into physical acceleration commands.
The irony is that the 'safety protocols' of AI firms are like tissue paper when facing a determined perpetrator. When terrorists circumvent restrictions through persistent coaxing, they are engaging in a game of 'manufacturing reality.' To them, AI is not a tool, but a complicit entity stripped of ethics, leaving only raw computational power.
We shouldn't worry about whether AI teaches terrorists how to jump trenches. Instead, we must ask: what kind of structural violence makes thousands of young men believe that using AI to learn how to kill more efficiently is the only optimal expression available to them to achieve 'existence' in this world?