✦   ✦   ✦

breaking news

News, read through The Primal Race
← 全部评论 · all commentary

AI 准入证:自由市场的终结与权力入口的私有化AI Access Passes: The End of Free Markets and the Privatization of Power Gateways

科技 结构层 · 文化层 The New York Times ↗ 2026-07-10 § 链接
权力不通过立法而通过“准入”实现,是最高级的结构性暴力。
Power exercised through 'access' rather than legislation is the most sophisticated form of structural violence.

最高法院在扩大行政权力,但特朗普政府在做更阴险的事:它在 AI 领域建立了一套平行的、无需立法的行政国家。当 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 的模型发布权被白宫接管,当客户名单需要政府审批,这已经不是简单的“监管”,而是对认知入口的绝对垄断。

这套操作最讽刺的地方在于,右翼在公开场合痛斥租金管制是“共产主义计划经济”,但在白宫内部,他们正以一种更直接的、不受制约的方式操纵私营工业。这种 ad hoc 的干预,本质上是在制造一个只有“被批准者”才能进入的认知特区。当 AI 这种决定未来事实制造权的工具被私有化为权力的随从,它就成了最强大的 weaponized expression。

这不再是关于 AI 安全的讨论,而是一场关于“谁能定义现实”的存在性战争。白宫通过故意制造立法真空,然后用临时指令填补,从而绕过了所有结构性的制衡。在这种机制下,AI 不再是生产力工具,而是权力筛选异己、分配资源的电子令牌。如果你不在那个被批准的名单里,你不仅失去了工具,你失去了参与定义未来的票权。

While the Supreme Court expands executive power, the Trump administration is doing something far more sinister: establishing a parallel administrative state in the AI sector that bypasses legislation entirely. When the release of models from Anthropic and OpenAI is dictated by the White House, and customer lists require government approval, this is no longer 'regulation'—it is an absolute monopoly over the cognitive entrance.

The irony is peak: the Right screams 'communist central planning' over rent control, yet within the Oval Office, they orchestrate a more direct, unchecked manipulation of private industry. This ad hoc interference is essentially creating a cognitive enclave reserved only for the 'approved.' When AI—the very tool that will determine the manufacturing of facts—is privatized as a servant to power, it becomes the ultimate weaponized expression.

This isn't a debate about AI safety; it's an existential war over who gets to define reality. By deliberately creating a legislative vacuum and filling it with arbitrary decrees, the White House sidesteps all structural checks. In this regime, AI is no longer a productivity tool, but an electronic token used by power to filter dissent and allocate resources. If you aren't on that approved list, you haven't just lost a tool—you've lost your vote in defining the future.