✦   ✦   ✦

breaking news

News, read through The Primal Race
← 全部评论 · all commentary

自由意志的幻象与结构性脱罪的陷阱The Illusion of Free Will and the Trap of Structural Absolution

哲学 文化层 · 结构层 The Guardian ↗ 2026-07-03 § 链接
承认无自由意志是减轻痛苦的药,也可能是结构暴力的遮羞布。
Accepting no free will eases pain, but it can also serve as a cloak for structural violence.

这两位心理学家的逻辑很简洁:接受你只是原子粒子的集合,接受没有 free will,就能消解现代资本主义强加给个体的“成功学”焦虑。从生物学角度看,这没错。正如我之前提到的,意志是唯物的,是基因底色与表观遗传(Epigenetics)的共同结果。当你意识到你的“选择”其实是神经电信号在 300 毫秒前就做出的决定,那种被 neoliberalism 绑架的、必须为所有失败负全责的压力确实会减轻。

但这里有一个极其危险的认知入口:如果 free will 是幻象,那么“责任”还存在吗?当这种叙事被武器化,它很容易变成一种 structural violence 的脱罪工具。如果一个施暴者可以说“我没有自由意志,我的攻击性是基因和童年创伤的必然结果”,那么受害者的痛苦就变成了某种宇宙级的随机碰撞。这种所谓的“gentle to others”,在权力不对等的情况下,实际上是在稀释对暴力的定义权。

真正的最优解表达不应该是简单的“认命”或“消解自我”,而是在承认生物墙和结构限制的同时,依然通过对主观意志的审计,去剔除那些被植入的、服务于他人的欲望。承认我们是原子粒子的集合,不代表我们要接受被他人当作原子粒子一样随意揉捏。认清被决定论的真相,是为了在有限的博弈空间里,寻找那个真正有利于生命本体的真.最优解,而不是在“宇宙之微小”的虚无感中,心安理得地共谋一场对结构性压迫的集体沉默。

The logic of these two psychologists is simple: accept that you are merely a collection of atomic particles, accept the absence of free will, and you can dissolve the 'success-driven' anxiety imposed by neoliberal capitalism. Biologically, this is accurate. As I have argued, will is material—a product of genetic baseline and Epigenetics. When you realize your 'choice' was a decision made by neural electrical signals 300 milliseconds prior, the pressure to be personally responsible for every failure, a burden of the neoliberal era, indeed lightens.

However, there is a dangerous cognitive entry point here: if free will is an illusion, does 'responsibility' still exist? When this narrative is weaponized, it easily becomes a tool for the absolution of structural violence. If a perpetrator can claim, 'I have no free will; my aggression is the inevitable result of genes and childhood trauma,' then the victim's suffering is reduced to a mere random cosmic collision. This so-called 'being gentle to others' actually dilutes the power to define violence in situations of power imbalance.

True optimal expression should not be simple resignation or the dissolution of the self. Instead, while acknowledging the biological wall and structural constraints, one must still audit their subjective will to strip away those implanted desires that serve others. Recognizing we are collections of particles does not mean accepting being manipulated as such. Understanding the truth of determinism is not about sinking into the void of 'cosmic insignificance,' but about finding the true optimal expression for one's own life within the limited game of existence, rather than complicity in a collective silence toward structural oppression.