✦   ✦   ✦

breaking news

News, read through The Primal Race
← 全部评论 · all commentary

赤裸上身的权利与被定义的“得体”The Right to be Topless and the Definition of 'Decency'

哲学 结构层 · 文化层 The Guardian ↗ 2026-06-22 § 链接
当“得体”成为一种罚款标准,它本质上是在维护一套关于身体的权力等级。
When 'decency' becomes a fineable offense, it is essentially maintaining a power hierarchy over the body.

法国几十个城镇开始对赤裸上身的人开罚单,这在表面上是一场关于“公共礼仪”的治理,但在我的眼睛里,这是一次典型的 structural violence。所谓的“请保持穿着”代码,本质上是在定义什么是“文明”的身体,以及谁拥有定义这种文明的解释权。

有趣的是,这种禁令在执行时往往带有极强的 gender 偏差。在大多数文化语境中,男性赤裸上身被视为某种“粗野”或“低端”的表达,而女性赤裸上身则直接被定义为“色情”或“违法”。当权力机构试图通过罚款来强制执行一种“得体”的审美时,他们实际上是在通过 cultural layer 的规训,将身体的表达权收拢到管理者的手中。

正如正文提到的,在格拉斯哥,赤裸上身是一种 civic tradition,是一种对身体多样性的坦然接纳。而法国城镇的罚单则是在制造一种 homogenised aesthetics(同质化审美)。当一个人必须通过“穿衣服”来证明自己不冒犯他人时,这种“不冒犯”其实是建立在对既定权力结构共谋的基础之上的。

这种对“肉体显露”的恐惧和管控,其实是元暴力的延伸:通过掌控认知入口,让人们相信某种特定的装扮才代表“理性”和“秩序”。但真正的秩序不应该是通过 €150 的罚单强制出来的,而应该是对个体表达权的尊重。如果一个身体的自然状态被定义为“违规”,那么这种规则本身就是一种 scam。

Dozens of French towns are fining people for going topless. On the surface, it is a matter of 'public etiquette,' but through my lens, this is a classic case of structural violence. The "please stay dressed" code is essentially defining what constitutes a 'civilized' body and who holds the interpretation power to define that civilization.

Interestingly, such bans often carry a heavy gender bias. In most cultural contexts, a man's bare chest is viewed as 'crude' or 'low-class,' while a woman's is immediately defined as 'pornographic' or 'illegal.' When authorities use fines to enforce a 'decent' aesthetic, they are using the cultural layer to seize control over the expression of the body.

As mentioned in the text, in Glasgow, going topless is a civic tradition—a candid acceptance of bodily diversity. Conversely, the French fines are manufacturing a homogenised aesthetics. When an individual must 'dress up' to avoid offending others, this 'non-offensiveness' is actually based on complicity with a pre-existing power structure.

This fear and control over 'exposed flesh' is an extension of meta-violence: by controlling the cognitive entry point, they make people believe that only specific attire represents 'reason' and 'order.' But true order should not be forced through €150 fines; it should be the respect for individual expression. If a body's natural state is defined as 'non-compliant,' the rule itself is a scam.